From: FESE, to download click here

European Exchanges will and should continue to remain open at all times to ensure safety, integrity and fairness in a secure and transparent manner.

1 – Technically and operationally: Markets continue to function in an orderly and transparent manner despite the extreme trading conditions triggered by the Covid-19 crisis. The controls and circuit-breakers in place work normally and with the necessary flexibility to meet market demand.  Contingency plans have been activated and will ensure everything is working as it was designed, including in the context of “working from home” protocols.

2 – Orderly functioning of financial markets: The constant news flow results in a continuous revision of investors’ valuations of securities and is generating the need to rebalance portfolios dynamically. It is expected that the current crisis will continue to generate both negative news flow, for example to lock-down decisions, and positive news flow, for example to the impact of significant  government support plans. Investors  need to adapt to the changing economic circumstances and the controls in place at trading venues are even more important in such volatile market conditions with  circuit-breakers  allowing investors to absorb new information. More generally, the pricing of risk needs to remain transparent, accessible and reliable across asset classes to allow investors to value portfolios and make informed investment and hedging decisions under these volatile conditions.

3 – Contractually: The closure of markets would trigger all kinds of procyclical contractual clauses in a very wide range of financing and even operational contracts These  potential and open-ended consequences could generate an unpredictable number of defaults. Derivatives contracts in particular are seen as reliable with observable reference prices allowing for an  orderly expiry and settlement process. These instruments are often used as proxies or hedging tools for many related OTC markets, for example credit markets. A closure of the lit markets would likely have a material impact on the functioning of a broad array of OTC markets given the removal of key hedging tools that would render broader risk management extremely challenging.

4 – Regulatory and litigation consequences as well as effects on smaller investors: A closure of markets would trigger the massive expansion of all sorts of off-market bilateral arrangements outside of transparent trading venues and without the protections prevalent on trading venues. All investors would be impacted by such a situation, but small investors would be worst hit by a move to such opaque arrangements concluded between professional investors as they  would only be able to adjust their positions at the re-opening of the reference trading venues.

Closing the markets would not change the underlying cause of the market volatility,  it would remove transparency of investor sentiment and reduce investors access to their money; all of which would compound current market anxiety and result in a negative decline in investor outcomes.